Zombie Apocalypse Survival Map

So, the Zombie Apocalypse has started.  You find yourself unprepared and in need of weapons, ammo, food, water, medical supplies… What to do, what to do?  There is now an online map for you to locate areas to procure your goods while you are still among the living.  Here is the link:

http://www.stumbleupon.com/su/4bgIOf/:-E6cuJk+:Q+f9Tecn/www.mapofthedead.com/map/

Don’t fight zombies unprepared.  Type in your zip code, print out your map, and put it with your zombie apocalypse kits.  Sure, it might never happen, but what if it does?  Always be prepared…

 

By the way, if you think Hooters is just about the food, try ordering a beer and burger in a Zombie Apocalypse… Just saying…

4 Comments

Filed under Humor and Observations

Horror Anthology Submissions Requested

For all of you writers or aspiring writers, each year I help publish an anthology on one subject.  Last year, we published Twisted History, and all the stories were alternative history.  It was “twisted” because we had comedy writers, fiction, non-fiction and other genre writers all writing alternative history.  This year, the topic is horror, and the working title is Twisted Nightmares.  We accept any form of writing, poems, flash fiction, or short stories up to 5,000 words.  Your submissions are judged anonymously by a panel of writers and editors.  Selected submissions will then be professionally edited and returned to you for changes.  The deadline for submissions is January 31, 2013.  Expected publication date is March 1, 2013.  Here is a flyer which has more detail, and also has our cover, supplied to us by the original photographer for use.  (more on them later :-))

Twisted Nightmares!

Horror Anthology

 Submissions Needed, 5,000 words or less, only horror themes.  WORD format preferred, only electronic submissions accepted.

Publishing by Michael Bradley, President, Eiverness Consulting Group, Ltd., An Arizona Corporation in Good Standing

Blademouth

Submissions required by January 31, 2013.  Expected publication prior to May 2013 and published in Kindle format.

Please send inquiries and submissions to:

eiverness@cox.net

For the subject put:  Anthology Submission

This publication is designed to be an additional opportunity to highlight the talents of aspiring writers.  Those chosen for publication will receive two free copies of the printed version and will be able to buy printed copies at cost for their own use or sale.  All other profits and expenses, including electronic sales will be retained by the publisher.

Original Makeup and Character by: Kiera Von D – Blademouth (see more of Kiera’s work here:www.facebook.com/nytroxsfx)
Shared by: Jona Than

To see how pretty Blademouth is in real life and learn more:

http://www.examiner.com/slideshow/seattle-s-sweetheart-blade-mouth-aka-kiera-von-d-an-aspiring-special-effects-make-up-artist

 

 

Leave a comment

Filed under Writing

New 3D Printers Allow You to Make Your Own Fully Operational Plastic Guns

 

(If you do not understand 3D printing, and how it allows you to manufacture items at home, please go to my home page and search for “3d printing” for a post that explains it, along with a video – Michael Bradley, Time Traveler and Author)

 

It’s beginning to look as if someone doesn’t want Defense Distributed to manufacture and distribute the world’s first open-source 3D printed firearm, as the company responsible for the 3D printer used to design the prototype has reclaimed its machine for fear of illegality.

Plans to create the world’s first open-source fully operational firearm – created on a 3D printer – have hit a slight snag with the news that the manufacturer that created the printer being used in the design process has seized the machine being used by the people behind the project, claiming that it is not willing to allow its hardware to be used for a project that violates federal firearms laws.

We reported on Defense Distributed’s Wiki Weapon project last week after it reached its $20,000 crowdfunding goal essentially solo, having been pushed out by IndieGoGo for, again, concerns surrounding the legality of actually creating a working gun via 3D printer with an aim of then releasing the plans online for free, so that anyone with access to 3D printing technology could, worryingly easily, create a firearm of their own. The project is the brainchild of one Cody Wilson, a law student from Texas who defended it in the abstract under the constitution’s right to bear arms – “People say you’re going to allow people to hurt people, well, that’s one of the sad realities of liberty. People abuse freedom, but that’s no excuse not to have these rights or to feel good about someone taking them away from you,” he said in response to criticism – but also admitted that there may be valid legal concerns about the project moving forward. “I haven’t felt any real heat yet, but I think it’s very possible the project might happen outside of America or the files might be hosted outside of America,” he’s said when asked about potential legal threats. “The point of manufacture might also have to be outside of the United States.”

Apparently, that point of design may need to be outside of the United States as well, following new developments.

Stratsys, the company that created the uPrint SE 3D printer being used by Defense Distributed in the creation of the prototype, has released a statement about its seizure of the equipment, saying that it acted after discovering that Defense Distributed didn’t have a firearm manufacturer license. “It is the policy of Stratasys not to knowingly allow its printers to be used for illegal purposes,” the company explained in a letter to Wilson himself. That’s a charge that Wilson denies, saying “Our intentions are not to break the law. This is America; I don’t need to register a thing.”

If that sounds a little over-the-top and defiant to you, Wilson can apparently back it up. He told the Guardian newspaper that he approached the US Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives about Wiki Weapon, and was told that there were no clear guidelines on whether or not a license was necessary. “Basically, the law has not anticipated this,” Wilson explained. “Current laws rely on conventional ideas of what a gun is.”

Wilson isn’t deterred by this latest setback, having applied for a manufacturer’s license, and started work on turning Defense Distributed into a company in the traditional sense. “We’ll get there,” he said of the project’s ultimate aim, “but I guess I’ve got to turn into a capitalist before it’s all said and done.”

Read more: http://www.digitaltrends.com/cool-tech/3d-printed-gun-company-gets-machinery-repossessed-by-manufacturer/#ixzz2DOjFBxQx
Follow us: @digitaltrends on Twitter | digitaltrendsftw on Facebook

MORE – 

Just because 3D printing will make production more attainable by individuals, does that mean that everyone should be able to produce whatever they want? That hypothetical conundrum has a new reality to it with the announcement that Wiki Weapon, which aims to release plans to allow anyone to 3D print working firearms, has been fully funded.

The advent of 3D printing has been heralded by many as a revolution in mass production, especially with home versions of 3D printers now becoming available. With these devices and a little bit of technical know-how, the converts casually pronounce, anything is possible in the brave new world. That may be true, but it’s always worth remembering: “anything” doesn’t necessarily tend to limit itself to the good stuff.

Last week, Defense Distributed’s Wiki Weapon project reached its funding goal, meaning that – barring any unforeseen circumstances – it will be able to go ahead with its plan to create the world’s first fully-printable, working plastic gun, before going on to make the blueprints for said device available online, for free, for anyone to download and use to build their own firearm. As you might expect, that’s not an idea that thrills everyone.

The project is the creation of a University of Texas law student called Cody Wilson, who worked with a group of engineers, designers and programmers to develop the prototype device after discussing the idea with friends. Wilson is well-aware of ideological objections to make it possible for firearms to be created without license or guidelines, but he is firmly of the mindset that it’s better to live free than restrict an American’s right to bear arms. “People say you’re going to allow people to hurt people, well, that’s one of the sad realities of liberty. People abuse freedom,” he told the Guardian newspaper. “But that’s no excuse not to have these rights or to feel good about someone taking them away from you.”

Wilson is familiar with defending his idea. He initially tried to crowdsource Wiki Weapon on IndieGoGo, only for the website to freeze the project and refuse to share the $2,000 Wilson had already managed to raise beforehand (According to IndieGoGo, the project was frozen for violating company policy as it involved the sale of firearms, a charge that Wilson rejects as Wiki Weapon was never a for-profit project, nor planned to actually sell firearms, as such). Even after he went solo and managed to reach his crowdfunding goal, the problems haven’t ended; it turns out that actually fulfilling its aim may be illegal under US law (Specifically, it may run afoul of a 1988 law known as the Undetectable Firearms Act that prohibits entirely-plastic firearms).

Again, Wilson – who is, after all, a law student and therefore familiar with such legal challenges, is undeterred. “I haven’t felt any real heat yet, but I think it’s very possible the project might happen outside of America or the files might be hosted outside of America,” he’s on record as admitting. “The point of manufacture might also have to be outside of the United States.”

Even with full funding, it’s possible that Wiki Weapons will disappear without a trace like other crowdfunded projects. But it’s worth considering the project just a taste of what’s to come as 3D printing technology becomes more popular amongst the mainstream.

Read more: http://www.digitaltrends.com/cool-tech/wiki-weapon/#ixzz2DOizLm6t
Follow us: @digitaltrends on Twitter | digitaltrendsftw on Facebook

 

Leave a comment

Filed under Humor and Observations, Uncategorized

Cyber Monday SPECIALS!!

THREE CYBER MONDAY SPECIALS!!

1) For a limited time, you can purchase The Travelers’ Club and the Ghost Ship for just 99 cents, which is a 93% discount off the bookstore price on Kindle, Smashwords, and other online ebook vendors:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2)  You can purchase Twisted History for just 99 cents, which is an 87% discount from retail bookstore prices on Kindle, Smashwords, and other ebook vendors:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3)  You can get the Brand New – The Travelers’ Club – Fire and Ash (2nd in the Series) for just $4.99 cents, which is a 66% discount off the bookstore price on Kindle, Smashwords, and other online ebook vendors:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

EVEN BETTER – IF YOU LIKE OR SHARE THIS POST – YOU WILL AUTOMATICALLY ENTER A CONTEST TO HAVE A CHANCE TO WIN A FREE SIGNED COPY OF THE PRINT VERSION, MAILED DIRECTLY TO YOU AT NO COST!!

Thank you all for your ongoing support!

Michael Bradley

Author

1 Comment

Filed under Writing

Dog Shaming for Your Monday Blues…

Every Monday I post a variety of dog pictures to cheer you up on your Mondays with cute furry critters.  This is my second installment of “dog shaming” pictures:

5 Comments

Filed under Animals, Humor and Observations

How History’s Greatest Inventions Really Happened

In my earlier post on the “current wars” and Nikola Tesla, I already debunk much of the myth on Edison.  In truth, Edison was brilliant at creating the “skunkworks” a gathering of scientists and inventors in one place to develop and make practical applications for science advances.  As a scientist himself, he was not so good.  In fact, he was uneducated, was intimidated by smarter people, and refused to test theories mathematically.  He preferred his trial and error method of “finding 1,000 ways that is does NOT work,” instead of finding the way it works by math.  He was also a dishonest and immoral competitor, who killed both animals and created the electric chair for no other reason than to scare people from using AC electricity.

Here is a story I found which shed further light on Edison, from The Atlantic:

– Derek Thompson is a senior editor at The Atlantic, where he oversees business coverage for the website.

Forget Edison: This is How History’s Greatest Inventions Really Happened

The myth of the solitary inventor — in 8 short stories

Screen Shot 2012-06-15 at 11.54.38 AM.png

The world’s most famous inventors are household names. As we all know, Thomas Edison invented the light bulb, Alexander Graham Bell invented the phone, and Eli Whitney invented the cotton gin.

Except they didn’t. The ideas didn’t spring, Athena-like, fully formed from their brains. In fact, they didn’t spring fully formed from anybody’s brains. That is the myth of the lonely inventor and the eureka moment.

“Simultaneous invention and incremental improvement are the way innovation works, even for radical inventions,” Mark A. Lemley writes in his fascinating paper The Myth of the Sole Inventor.Lemley’s paper concentrates on the history and problems of patents. But he also chronicles the history of the 19th and 20th century’s most famous inventors — with an emphasis on how their inventions were really neither theirs, nor inventions. Here is a super-quick summary of his wonderful distillation of the last 200 years in collaborative innovation.

439px-Patent_for_Cotton_Gin_(1794)_-_hi_res.jpg
COTTON GIN

The fabric cotton comes from cotton fibers that mix with seeds in the pods of cotton plants. To make the fabric, therefore, you have to separate the fibers from the seeds. For centuries this was done mostly by hand, until Eli Whitney “invented” the cotton gin in 1793. But various forms of roller gins (i.e. technologies for separating fibers from seeds) had been around for thousands of years. Five years earlier, in 1788, Joseph Eve developed his own mechanized self-feeding roller gin. Whitney’s true innovation was to improve existing cotton gins by “replacing rollers with coarse wire teeth that rotated through slits to pull the fiber from the seed.” If this insight was a breakthrough, the glory goes to Whitney only he was faster than his competitors. In 1795, John Barcley filed a patent on a gin featuring circles of teeth — awfully similar to Whitney’s wire-tooth model (see left). In short, the modern cotton gin was a eureka moment that multiple inventors experienced nearly simultaneously and was expedited by their competition.

 

TELEGRAPH


As the tale goes, Samuel Morse was having dinner with friends and debating electromagnetism (like you do) when he realized that if an electrical signal could travel instantly across a wire, why couldn’t information do the same? Like most fun eureka stories, L-Telegraph1.pngit’s a fib. The telegraph was invented by not only Morse, but also Charles Wheatstone, Sir William Fothergill Cooke, Edward Davy, and Carl August von Steinhiel so near to each other that the British Supreme Court refused to issue one patent. It was Joseph Henry, not Morse, who discovered that coiling wire would strengthen electromagnetic induction. Of Morse’s key contribution — the application of Henry’s electromagnets to boost signal strength — Lemley writes that “it is not even clear that he fully understood how that contribution worked.”


TELEPHONE

Like Morse, Alexander Graham Bell invented a technology that would later bear his name. But how much did he deserve it? The problem that Bell solved was to turn electrical signals into sounds. But this was such an obvious extension of the telegraph that there were many people working on it. Philip Reis had already designed a sound transmitter in 1860, and Hermann Ludwig Ferdinand von Helmholtz (one guy) had already built a receiver. Bell’s real contribution was “to vary the strength of the current to capture variations in voice and sound,” Lemley writes. In this tweak, he was racing against Thomas Edison. Even Bell’s final product — which combined transmitter, fluctuating current, and receiver — had company. Elisha Gray filed a patent application on the exact same day as Bell, only to lose the patent claim in court. Lemly’s conclusion: “Bell’s iconic status owes as much to his victories in court and in the marketplace as at the lab bench.”

Light_bulb.pngLIGHT-BULB

As just about everyone is taught, Thomas Edison invented the light-bulb. And as just about everyone later learns, Thomas Edison in no way invented the light-bulb. Electric lighting existed before him, incandescent light bulbs existed before him, and when other inventors got wind of Edison’s tinkerings, they roundly sued him for patent infringement. So what did Edison actually do? He discovered that a special species of bamboo had a higher resistance to electricity than carbonized paper, which means it could more efficiently produce light. Edison got rich off the bamboo, and filthy disgusting rich from superior manufacturing and marketing of his product. But within a generation other inventors had developed better filaments and today’s light-bulbs

THE MOVIE PROJECTOR

Most of these stories here are about how we mistake incremental improvements for eureka moments. But the story of the movie projector is simpler. It’s basically a story about theft. Francis Jenkins built what we consider the ur-instrument of the motion-picture industry with a projector that showed strips of films for 1/24th of a second, creating the illusion of moving pictures. But his financial backer stole the Jenkins prototype and sold it to a theater chain, which called it the “Edison Vitascope” for no better reason than the word Edison was familiar and useful for branding. That Edison was tinkering with his own movie projector is true, but besides the point. His legacy here was mostly the work of a thief.

THE AUTOMOBILE

1885Benz.jpgToday’s cars bear the names of their founders and innovators: Benz, Peugeot, Renault. But have you ever heard of a Dodge bicycle? Or a Mercedes tricycle? In fact, both companies specialized in bikes before moving the autos. The car industry represents the epitome of incremental innovation. Take a tricycle. Add an engine. You’ve got a car. (Just look at the picture to the right, of the the original Benz Motorwagen from 1885). Condensing the invention of cars to those six words leaves out a lot of detail and a few main characters. It was Gottlieb Daimler and Wilhelm Maybach who designed the first four-wheel car with a four-stroke engine and Henry Ford who perfected the assembly line. But the long story short is that the car was a typical “invention” that was far too complicated for one person to conceive on his won.

399px-Wright_Flyer_III_above.jpg
THE AIRPLANE

Speaking of building bikes, that’s exactly what Orville and Wilbur Wright did before they became the first team to fly a heavier-than-air machine. But, as we’ve learned, every great inventor stands on the shoulders of giants. When the Wright brothers asked the Smithsonian for all available information on the history of flight in 1899, they opened  a history that had begun with DaVinci’s scribbling and continued all the way to the 19th century gliders of Otto Liliental. But the Wrights solved one of the most nagging problems facing airplane developers — stability — by having “a single cable warp the wing and turn the rudder at the same time.” That was the tweak that put the first plane in the air.

TELEVISION

The “Farnsworth Invention” was named after Philo T. Farnsworth, the nominal father of television. But his invention was neither his nor an invention. Teams of scientists and tinkerers all around the world were working to build, essentially, a radio for images — i.e.: to combine the technology of a wireless telegraph with the magic of a movie projector. One key was the cathode ray tube, a vacuum with an electron gun that beams images onto screen that can receive or transmit signals. But the cathode ray tube itself has so many fathers that it’s difficult to say exactly who invented even the central organ of the television, much less the television itself. In 1927, Farnsworth projected a straight line on a machine he called the Image Dissector, which is truly the basis for the all-electronic television. But, unlike Edison, he was not as gifted at marketing, producing, and becoming a household name for his tweak. “It may be accurate to describe Farnsworth as an inventor of the television, but surely not as the inventor,” Lemley writes.

***

At the end of this section, Lemley lists four inventors who, yeah, okay, really were alone. But the funny thing about the exceptions is that they’re almost all accidents.

Alexander Fleming discovered the anti-bacterial properties of penicillin because a sample of bacteria had accidentally been contaminated with mold. No one is sure where the mold came from; Fleming’s discovery was true serendipity. Even in that case, there is some evidence that others made the same accidental discovery. The adhesive behind the Post-It note was developed in 1968, and languished in 3M for six years before a different 3M employee hit on the idea of putting it to use attaching a bookmark to a book.

Charles Goodyear discovered vulcanized rubber when a batch of rubber was accidentally left on a stove; Goodyear had previously thought that heat was a problem for rubber, not the solution.

Wilson Greatbatch developed the pacemaker when he accidentally grabbed the wrong resistor from a box when he was completing a circuit.

Louis Daguerre invented film when, having failed to produce an image on an iodized silver plate, he put the plate away in a cabinet filled with chemicals and the fumes from a spilled jar of mercury produced an image on the plate.

It would seem that eureka is Greek for “oops.”

Images above from top: the cotton gin patent by Eli Whitney; a Morse key; Edison’s patent; the Benz patent; the Wright brothers take off, 1905; All credit: Wikimedia Commons

1 Comment

Filed under Humor and Observations

100 Exquisite Adjectives

I saw this on Daily Writing Tips and thought you all might appreciate it.  It misses a couple of my favorites:

Obsequious – servile – subservient – slavish – menial – fawning

Volatile – 1. evaporating rapidly; passing off readily in the form of vapor:Acetone is a volatile solvent.  2. tending or threatening to break out into open violence;explosive: a volatile political situation.  3. changeable; mercurial; flighty: a volatile disposition.  4. (of prices, values, etc.) tending to fluctuate sharply andregularly: volatile market conditions.  5. fleeting; transient: volatile beauty.

Capricious – subject to, led by, or indicative of caprice  or whim; erratic

Mercurial – changeable; volatile; fickle; flighty; erratic

Beneficent – doing good or causing good to be done; conferring benefits;  kindly inaction or purpose.

I suggest as a writer, use these sparingly, as some of our reading population has grown lax on their vocabulary due to watching more TV than reading literature.

100 Exquisite Adjectives

by Mark Nichol
Adjectives — descriptive words that modify nouns — often come under fire for their cluttering quality, but often it’s quality, not quantity, that is the issue. Plenty of tired adjectives are available to spoil a good sentence, but when you find just the right word for the job, enrichment ensues. Practice precision when you select words. Here’s a list of adjectives:

Adamant: unyielding; a very hard substance
Adroit: clever, resourceful
Amatory: sexual
Animistic: quality of recurrence or reversion to earlier form
Antic: clownish, frolicsome
Arcadian: serene
Baleful: deadly, foreboding
Bellicose: quarrelsome (its synonym belligerent can also be a noun)
Bilious: unpleasant, peevish
Boorish: crude, insensitive
Calamitous: disastrous
Caustic: corrosive, sarcastic; a corrosive substance
Cerulean: sky blue
Comely: attractive
Concomitant: accompanying
Contumacious: rebellious
Corpulent: obese
Crapulous: immoderate in appetite
Defamatory: maliciously misrepresenting
Didactic: conveying information or moral instruction
Dilatory: causing delay, tardy
Dowdy: shabby, old-fashioned; an unkempt woman
Efficacious: producing a desired effect
Effulgent: brilliantly radiant
Egregious: conspicuous, flagrant
Endemic: prevalent, native, peculiar to an area
Equanimous: even, balanced
Execrable: wretched, detestable
Fastidious: meticulous, overly delicate
Feckless: weak, irresponsible
Fecund: prolific, inventive
Friable: brittle
Fulsome: abundant, overdone, effusive
Garrulous: wordy, talkative
Guileless: naive
Gustatory: having to do with taste or eating
Heuristic: learning through trial-and-error or problem solving
Histrionic: affected, theatrical
Hubristic: proud, excessively self-confident
Incendiary: inflammatory, spontaneously combustible, hot
Insidious: subtle, seductive, treacherous
Insolent: impudent, contemptuous
Intransigent: uncompromising
Inveterate: habitual, persistent
Invidious: resentful, envious, obnoxious
Irksome: annoying
Jejune: dull, puerile
Jocular: jesting, playful
Judicious: discreet
Lachrymose: tearful
Limpid: simple, transparent, serene
Loquacious: talkative
Luminous: clear, shining
Mannered: artificial, stilted
Mendacious: deceptive
Meretricious: whorish, superficially appealing, pretentious
Minatory: menacing
Mordant: biting, incisive, pungent
Munificent: lavish, generous
Nefarious: wicked
Noxious: harmful, corrupting
Obtuse: blunt, stupid
Parsimonious: frugal, restrained
Pendulous: suspended, indecisive
Pernicious: injurious, deadly
Pervasive: widespread
Petulant: rude, ill humored
Platitudinous: resembling or full of dull or banal comments
Precipitate: steep, speedy
Propitious: auspicious, advantageous, benevolent
Puckish: impish
Querulous: cranky, whining
Quiescent: inactive, untroublesome
Rebarbative: irritating, repellent
Recalcitant: resistant, obstinate
Redolent: aromatic, evocative
Rhadamanthine: harshly strict
Risible: laughable
Ruminative: contemplative
Sagacious: wise, discerning
Salubrious: healthful
Sartorial: relating to attire, especially tailored fashions
Sclerotic: hardening
Serpentine: snake-like, winding, tempting or wily
Spasmodic: having to do with or resembling a spasm, excitable, intermittent
Strident: harsh, discordant; obtrusively loud
Taciturn: closemouthed, reticent
Tenacious: persistent, cohesive,
Tremulous: nervous, trembling, timid, sensitive
Trenchant: sharp, penetrating, distinct
Turbulent: restless, tempestuous
Turgid: swollen, pompous
Ubiquitous: pervasive, widespread
Uxorious: inordinately affectionate or compliant with a wife
Verdant: green, unripe
Voluble: glib, given to speaking
Voracious: ravenous, insatiable
Wheedling: flattering
Withering: devastating
Zealous: eager, devoted

Leave a comment

Filed under Writing

1899: First Vehicle to go Over 110 KPH (62 MPH)

“The Never Satisfied” is the name of the French vehicle made of Partinium that was the first car to go over 100 kilometers per hour, in 1899.  Does not look like it has a lot of safety features…  That must have been like seeing a space craft for people in 1899.  Amazing!

CLICK on pictures for full picture!

1899:
First 100km/h vehicle
Amanda Uren

“La Jamais Contente (English: The Never Satisfied) was the first vehicle to go over 100 kilometres per hour (62 mph). It was an electric vehicle with a light alloy torpedo shaped bodywork and with Fulmen batteries. The high position of the driver and the exposed chassis underneath spoiled much of the aerodynamics.  The light alloy, called partinium, is an alloy of aluminum, tungsten and magnesium.”

1 Comment

Filed under Humor and Observations, Uncategorized

New Lincoln Movie

You’ve seen Lincoln kill vampires, you’ve seen Lincoln as history portrayed him, now, it is time for the REAL story…

 

3 Comments

Filed under Humor and Observations

Steampunk/Clockwork Bugs! (Part One)

These are all Steampunk/Clockpunk/Clockwork Bugs.  I have too many for one post, so maybe next week I will post part two.  Until then, please enjoy these wonderfully crafted items from people at various places with much more talent than I have.  I must also put in a small plug, that clockwork bugs, much larger and deadlier than these, play an important role in The Travelers’ Club – Fire and Ash, on sale now on Kindle, Smashwords, local bookstores, and on this site, under STORE tab.  I hear the author is very creative…  🙂

 

2 Comments

Filed under Animals, Humor and Observations, Uncategorized, Writing