Tag Archives: 3d printing

3D Pen – Draw 3D Art!

The world’s first 3D printing pen: Yours for just $75

The 3Doodler, 3D printing pen

Come September, if everything goes to plan, the world’s first 3D printing pen will go on sale for $75. The pen, called the 3Doodler, essentially allows you to lift your flat sketches off the paper — or, if you wish, to actually draw in three dimensions.

3Doodler is a Kickstarter project, and in under 24 hours it has obtained more than $500,000 in pledges — significantly more than its $30,000 target. As you can see in the video below, the inventors have already created an impressive prototype — and now it’s time to bring the 3Doodler to market. The target price is $75 for a September 2013 release. The inventors say they have already located a Chinese manufacturer who is capable of meeting these targets. The final device should 24mm (1in) thick and weigh less than 200g, with an external power brick that accepts 110-240V.

In essence, 3Doodler is a standard 3D printer, but your hand controls the print head instead of a bunch of computer-controlled motors. (See: What is 3D printing?) Inside the 3Doodler is a filament feeder (which accepts ABS or PLA plastic), a heating element, and an extruder — and that’s about it. The melted plastic comes out of the extruder and very quickly sets. As far as we can tell, the plastic oozes out of the extruder at a set rate — so depending on whether you want a thin (weak and flexible) or thick (strong and rigid) line, you move the 3Doodler quickly or slowly. For strength and flexibility, you just go back and forth over the same section, building up a web of plastic tendrils (like in the Eiffel Tower above).

Judging by the massive support for 3Doodler on Kickstarter, it’s safe to assume that people are really excited at the concept of a freehand 3D printer. It’s not hard to see why, though, if you were a child who dreamt of drawing sketches that literally jump off the paper. The actual reality of freehand 3D printing might be a little more complex than most users bargain for, but to that end the inventors have teamed up up with professional artists to provide 3Doodler backers with templates/stencils that you can simply fill in. The Kickstarter page also seems to lack any evidence that 3Doodler is capable of drawing straight lines, but hopefully it’s just a matter of using a ruler.

A collection of 3Doodler objects

Moving forward, this could be a very exciting stepping stone for inventors and hobbyists alike. While 3D printers have revolutionized rapid prototyping tool, the 3Doodler is even faster; it adds a whole new dimension (!) to back-of-the-napkin brainstorming. To begin with, I suspect it will be quite hard to create meaningful sketches with a 3Doodler, but in time — and with a whole range of usability tweaks and add-on accessories that I’m sure will follow — the 3D printing pen might become as ubiquitous as the 2D Bic ballpoint. (See: 3D printing: a replicator and teleporter in every home.)

1 Comment

Filed under Humor and Observations, Uncategorized

3d printing of guns – update

As followers know, I have said that 3d printing will change everything as we know it.  In an earlier post, I discussed how guns can be printed, and another post talks about how the military uses 3d printing for making knives and other tools.  Here is an update on this revolutionary technology:

Print and fire: 3D printing could muzzle new gun laws

By 

Published February 13, 2013

FoxNews.com

  • gunclip2.jpg

    Cody Wilson of Defense Distributed testing out the “Cuomo Clip” (DefenseDistributed.com)

  • gunclip3.jpg
    DefenseDistributed.com
  • gunclip4.jpg
    DefenseDistributed.com
  • gunclip1.jpg

    A computer rendering of a “Cuomo Clip”, a 30-round ammo magazine for the AR-15 rifle. (DefenseDistributed.com)

Gun owners who can’t buy high capacity ammo magazines because of new laws have another option: Print them.

Gun control measures passed or proposed in the wake of the Sandy Hook school massacre have targeted magazines that can feed 30 rounds or more into the firing chambers of AR-15s and other semi-automatic guns. New York has banned magazines holding more than seven rounds, and a federal bill proposed by Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., would ban magazines holding more than 10 rounds.

But the laws are at least one step behind technology. Using 3D printers and schematics available on the Internet, gun owners can manufacture a fully functional, plastic magazine clip. Plans are free, although getting access to a 3D printer may prove expensive, at least for now.

“If you can download it, you can have it.”

– Cody Wilson, Defense Distributed/Wiki Weapons Project 

“If you can download it, you can have it,” said University of Texas law student Cody Wilson, who is part of Defense Distributed, a group that has created the design for what they refer to as a “Cuomo Clip” along with other gun parts. It is all under an initiative they refer to as the Wiki Weapon Project.

“It’s basically to head them [legislators] off at the pass, which we have,” Wilson added, noting that “hundreds of thousands” of visitors have gone to his group’s site to download the CAD file for the ammo magazine since it was first posted in mid-January.

The “Cuomo Clip,” named for New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo, who pushed the high-capacity clip ban through the Legislature, is made from a plastic filament similar to the type of material used to manufacture LEGO building blocks. It is also loaded with a large spring that helps to push rounds of ammo into the gun chamber.

The ammo magazine clip appears to be durable; Defense Distributed test-fired 86 rounds from a 30-round prototype last month, and the clip showed no signs of damage.

The cutting edge technology, in which three-dimensional objects can be manufactured from melted plastic thread, is likely to complicate efforts to control firearms. No such ability existed in 1994, when large-capacity clips were first banned in an initial federal assault weapons ban that lasted a decade.

Although the new ban proposed by Feinstein would prohibit the manufacture of magazines, it focuses on traditional arms makers and sellers. How the law might be enforced against individuals making their own magazines — and possibly even guns in the future — is unclear.

Rep. Steve Israel, D-N.Y., has called for amending the Undetectable Firearms Act of 1988, which initially sought to ban guns that could be sneaked through metal detectors, to include a ban on “homemade, 3-D printed, plastic high-capacity magazines.”

“Congress passed a law banning plastic guns for two decades when they were just a movie fantasy,” Israel told FoxNews.com. “With the advent of 3-D printers, these guns are suddenly a real possibility, and the law Congress passed is set to expire this year.

“We should act now to give law enforcement authorities the power to stop the development of these weapons before terrorists and criminals can easily bring them on planes. We need to be proactive and keep ahead of the technology. When the legislation was originally passed in 1988, no one would have imagined that parts of a gun and a magazine could be made with a printer — imagine what the technology will be even five years down the road.”

Defense Distributed and the Wiki Weapons Project also has made schematics of other parts of the AR-15 and other weapons and modifications, including pistol grips, but has avoided attempting to design and distribute plans for a fully-functional gun.

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/tech/2013/02/13/print-draw-fire-3d-printing-could-muzzle-new-gun-laws/#ixzz2KoiE5x24

Leave a comment

Filed under Humor and Observations

Printing Food

3D printers are the technology that will change everything ab0ut our lives.  I was just having dinner with friends and said if you can put polymers in a 3d printer and print out three dimensional objects, why not put food paste, texture, flavor packets and coloring and print food?  In essence, you could transmit a “recipe” to a printer as easily as a structural diagram, and food is just as easy to layer as polymer.  I had no idea it would be tried so soon.  Get drunk late at night and want to head to Taco Bell?  Want a pizza delivered during the big game?  Why not print one out?  Go to pizzarecipe.com, pick out your favorite, download to the printer, voila!  Star Trek Replicators now.

A single 3D-printed burger currently costs over $300,000 to make

Jan. 22, 2013 (3:00 pm) By: 

Cheeseburgers

3D printing might be the wave of the future, or it might just end up a niche hobby that’s pretty cool but ultimately too expensive and complicated to ever take off. Whatever that fate may be, startup Modern Meadow is throwing its hat into the 3D printing ring, but rather than printing plastic trinkets or gun parts, it plans to print edible meat.

We’ve mentioned Modern Meadow – a company that is practicing a variant of 3D printing, called 3D bioprinting — before. Instead of using resin like standard 3D printing, or a material more easily sent through a printer for food-printing like melted chocolate that then hardens, Modern Meadow uses material somewhat creepily called “bioink”.

In order to print live cells, the engineers perform biopsies on animals and collect stem cells, or other special cells. Because stem cells are basically magical (this not a technical term), they can not only turn into other cells, but replicate themselves. Once they replicate enough times, the engineers load them into a bioprinter cartridge, which creates something of a bioink — a material made of many live cells. When the bioink is printed, the living cells link together and form living tissue.

Modern MeadowWhen using 3D bioprinting a hamburger as an example, Professor Gabor Forgacs — part of the father and son founders of Modern Meadow — notes that the actual shape of the food isn’t too much of a hurdle, as it’s simply a round, relatively 2D patty. Another benefit to producing edible meat is that the live tissue can die afterward, as consumable meat normally isn’t living tissue, so a method of preserving the tissue’s life isn’t really required.

Though it might be easier to print edible, dead-tissue meat, Modern Meadow is facing a couple fairly large hurdles. For one, convincing the world to eat lab-grown meat might not be so easy. Another significant hurdle is that though Modern Meadow hasn’t grown something like a burger or steak as of yet, the price of one would be astronomically high. Another team of researchers at Maastricht University in the Netherlands has been growing animal cells to produce strips of lean muscle, with the goal of creating an artificial hamburger. Though the team doesn’t use bioprinting, they do use a somewhat related process of having stem cells replicate and create live tissue in a mold. Unfortunately, creating an entire burger would currently cost over $300,000.

If this all seems a little nutty, Modern Meadow has managed to raise some backing from prominent figures, such as Peter Thiel, who was one of Facebook’s early investors. There’s no word yet on when the company will be able to print a burger (or even a slider!), but if it can, it will be interesting to see how much it’ll cost, and if people can be convinced that “synthetic” meat is truly edible.

1 Comment

Filed under Humor and Observations

Star Trek Replicators for the US Army

In my ongoing efforts to explain that 3d printing is THEE revolutionary invention of today…  The US Army is now using 3d printing for onsite manufacturing of equipment in war zones.  Star Trek style replicators are here.  Now.

replicator-menageatroi

Star Trek replicators for the Army

By 

Published January 10, 2013

FoxNews.com

  • 3D Replicator Knife.jpg

    A design for a knife made from a 3D printer to help dismounted soldiers probe for IEDs. The tool had to be plastic so as to not conduct with any IED surfaces it might uncover. (Army Rapid Equipping Force)

  • 3D Replicator Flashlight guard design.jpg

    A commonly used Army-issue flashlight has raised, exposed button that allow the light to be accidently turned on in pocket or pouch. This guard was developed and printed to prevent accidental power up and to save batteries. (Army Rapid Equipping Force)

  • 3D Replicator Flashlight guard.jpg

    A commonly used Army-issue flashlight has raised, exposed button that allow the light to be accidently turned on in pocket or pouch. This guard was developed and printed to prevent accidental power up and to save batteries. (Army Rapid Equipping Force)

  • 3D Replicator thermal cameras.jpg

    Soldiers needed a way to see immediately right or left of a vehicle. This camera system was developed and printed in a lab, including CNC-made mounting brackets and a 3D-printed monitor mount. (Army Rapid Equipping Force)

There’s a new force on the front lines, and it’s anything but out of this world.

Remote operating bases in Afghanistan are using Star Trek-style replicators, 3D printers capable of fabricating on the spot whatever the Army may need — from replacement vehicle parts to an entirely new piece of technology.

The Army’s Rapid Equipping Force (REF) worked with Applied Minds, Inc. and Exponent to make the science fiction dream a reality.  Thanks to their efforts, a lab equipped with the 3D printers is only a helicopter ride away.

‘[It’s] basically like a huge glue gun.’

– Westley Brin, product manager with the Army’s Rapid Equipping Force

While the locations cannot be released, the first two labs were posted to forward operating bases in Afghanistan. The third is currently under construction and due to deploy around June this year.

There are four types of computer-driven replicator: 3D printers, CNC mills, laser cutters and water cutters.

The state of the art lab is contained in a 20,000 pound, 20-foot long container that can be carried by a Chinook helicopter. It’s equipped with a 3D printer and a CNC mill, machines that resemble very large microwaves.

With them an engineer can build essentially anything.

How does it work?
“Soldiers walk into the lab and say, ‘this is my problem.’ The PhDs then do the work and show it to the soldiers. The soldiers give them feedback,” and they work together tinkering with the tech until it is exactly fit for purpose, explained Westley Brin, product manager with the REF.

The team uses software similar to that an architect would use, like CAD or computer-assisted design programs, to design their solution in the battlefield. After a design is drawn, they send the file to the 3D printer or the CNC.

3D printers, sometimes called rapid prototypers, take glue or resin and layer it to build the design from scratch.

Brin describes their 3D printer as “basically like a huge glue gun. When you pick up the object created, you can feel the ridges because it builds the object layer by layer. That’s why it’s so fragile.”

The 3D printers can make only softer plastics that last for a month or two — it’s a short-term solution in the field. They can also build several soft models and send them back to the U.S. or anywhere else for volume manufacturing.

CNC mills work differently: Using a drill bit, they take a hunk of aluminum or metal and carves it out as a human would carve a sculpture.

HELP BUILD SOMETHING

REF and the labs use the Broad Agency Announcements (BAA) site to solicit solutions. Anyone can submit a solution and if they think it shows promise they will send someone out to take a look. Know a MacGyver up for creating something for the troops? Check out the site.

A CNC can cut parts from more durable material; Brin describes its output as the “end-all, be-all piece” — meaning it isn’t a stop-gap but a screw, knife, distributor cap or whatever that can be used for the duration.

The lab also lets technicians dial out of Afghanistan to anywhere in the world for advice, whether it’s the CEO of a Fortune 500 company, a college professor or a 13-year-old girl. Anyone with a bright idea to solve the problem or improve the current solution is accessible.

From several thousand miles away, the pinch-hitting engineer can design and feed a solution to the lab in Afghanistan, where the 3D printer and CNC will work overnight. When the team arrives in the morning, presto, a new part is waiting.

What does it make?
Project Powerhand is one of the labs many success stories. Soldiers in Afghanistan use hand-held, ground penetrating radar to detect mines — devices with a very limited battery life.

By creating tech that took the lifespan from 60 minutes to a whopping 36 hours, they immediately made soldiers safer and gave them a tool they could use on a three-day patrol.

Next in the replicator pipeline for the Army is a bigger printer that will combine the CNC and the 3D capabilities and most likely reside at a major base. The labs posted to forward operating bases will be able to communicate with this monster to produce parts as well.

As operations in Afghanistan draw down, the Star Trek-style lab will still have enormous utility, going out with the Army to accompany first-responders at natural disasters within 24 to 48 hours for example.

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/tech/2013/01/10/star-trek-replicators-for-army/#ixzz2HjnNRuJd

Leave a comment

Filed under Humor and Observations

3D Printer Makes Super Strong Beams

More on how 3D printing is going to change our entire world.

Custom 3D-Printed Beams Can Be 10,000 Times Stronger Than Steel
NOV 30, 2012 12:00 PM

Custom 3D-Printed Beams Can Be 10,000 Times Stronger Than Steel

Steel beams are pretty uniformly strong, but they’re all run of the mill, literally. If you start 3D-printing custom beams for the exact purpose they’re intended to serve though, you’ve got a regular space-age material on your hands. It’s lighter than steel and orders of magnitude stronger.

The process, developed byYong Mao of the University of Nottingham, UK and colleagues, isn’t just the product of one innovation, but rather a whole bunch of them wrapped up into one bundle. First, you start out withF a hollow beam and you test it with the load it needs to bear. When it inevitably fails, you use some sophisticated software to analyze that sucker and 3D print an internal fractal structure to provide support, kind of like what’s inside your bones. Then lather, rinse, and repeat. With each iteration of ever-smaller fractal innards, the beam can gain strength by the order of magnitude, with practically negligible weight gain. Third generation beams, about as far as we can hope to go with current tech, are 10,000 times stronger than steel.

There is one big limitation to how strong you can get with this stuff however, and it all depends on printer fidelity. Since these sorts of beams are specifically designed, there’s not much extra support to carry your load, so if the mesh isn’t perfect, you could be in trouble. As 3D printers get better however, imperfections won’t be a problem on the larger scales, and more and more iterations will be possible, making for structures that are both incredibly strong and incredibly light. Now if only they could figure out how to 3D print some new bones for us. [Physics World]

Leave a comment

Filed under Humor and Observations

Human Enhancement Dangers

In my opinion, the two technologies that will effect us the most in the immediate future, are 3d personal printer manufacturing, and human enhancement.  We are nearing a time when we can replicate or build nearly anything in our home, and in which we will no longer be human.  We will start human, but will be updated to receive technology, correct defects, and enhance our abilities.  Here is a cautionary story on the latter topic:

Scientists raise the alarm on human enhancement technologies

The Royal Society, along with the Academy of Medical Sciences, British Academy, and Royal Academy of Engineering, recently concluded a workshop called Human Enhancement and the Future of Work in which they considered the growing impact and potential risks of augmentation technologies. In their final report, the collaborative team of scientists and ethicists raised serious concerns about the burgeoning trend, and how humanity is moving from a model of therapy to one in which human capacities are greatly improved. The implications, they concluded, should be part of a much wider public discussion.

Specifically, the report expressed concerns about drugs and digital technologies that will allow people to work harder, longer, and smarter. The resulting implications to work and human values, they argue, may not necessarily be a good thing. It’s quite possible, they argue, that employers will start to demand (either implicitly or explicitly) that employees “augment” themselves with stimulants such as Aderall.

Scientists raise the alarm on human enhancement technologies

Similarly, the workshop considered the potential for other smart drugs that can enhance memory and attention, as well as physical and digital enhancements such as cybernetic implants and advanced machine-interfacing technologies.

From the report:

Work will evolve over the next decade, with enhancement technologies potentially making a significant contribution. Widespread use of enhancements might influence an individual’s ability to learn or perform tasks and perhaps even to enter a profession; influence motivation; enable people to work in more extreme conditions or into old age, reduce work-related illness; or facilitate earlier return to work after illness.

At the same time however, they acknowledge the potential efficacy and demand for such technologies, prompting the call for open discourse. Again, from the report:

Although enhancement technologies might bring opportunities, they also raise several health, safety, ethical, social and political challenges, which warrant proactive discussion. Very different regulatory regimes are currently applied: for example, digital services and devices (with significant cognitive enhancing effects) attract less, if any, regulatory oversight than pharmacological interventions. This raises significant questions, such as whether any form of self-regulation would be appropriate and whether there are circumstances where enhancements should be encouraged or even mandatory, particularly where work involves responsibility for the safety of others (e.g. bus drivers or airline pilots).

Indeed, the details of the report, while most certainly reasonable, are also exceedingly obvious. In a way, it’s as if the workshop participants are late to the show and only now trying to get the word out. And in fact, given the popularity (and rampant misuse) of stimulants such as Provigil and the tremendous interest in nootropics (i.e. cognitive enhancers), the report does seem long overdue.

The panel’s recommendations, such as further investigations into ensuring safety, affordability, and accessibility are most certainly welcome. And their suggestion that some of these enhancement technologies — whether they be pharmaceutical, regenerative medicines, or cybernetics — should be regulated by the government is spot on. Given the potential for personal misuse — not to mention the potential exploitation by employers — would most certainly necessitate the need for regulatory oversight.And perhaps most encouragingly, rather than reacting hysterically and calling for an outright ban on enhancement technologies, the panelists have outlined a roadmap for getting these technologies integrated into our lives in a safe and effective way.

The entire report can be read here (pdf).

Top image via Royal Society et al. Inset image: drugs.com

1 Comment

Filed under Humor and Observations

New 3D Printers Allow You to Make Your Own Fully Operational Plastic Guns

 

(If you do not understand 3D printing, and how it allows you to manufacture items at home, please go to my home page and search for “3d printing” for a post that explains it, along with a video – Michael Bradley, Time Traveler and Author)

 

It’s beginning to look as if someone doesn’t want Defense Distributed to manufacture and distribute the world’s first open-source 3D printed firearm, as the company responsible for the 3D printer used to design the prototype has reclaimed its machine for fear of illegality.

Plans to create the world’s first open-source fully operational firearm – created on a 3D printer – have hit a slight snag with the news that the manufacturer that created the printer being used in the design process has seized the machine being used by the people behind the project, claiming that it is not willing to allow its hardware to be used for a project that violates federal firearms laws.

We reported on Defense Distributed’s Wiki Weapon project last week after it reached its $20,000 crowdfunding goal essentially solo, having been pushed out by IndieGoGo for, again, concerns surrounding the legality of actually creating a working gun via 3D printer with an aim of then releasing the plans online for free, so that anyone with access to 3D printing technology could, worryingly easily, create a firearm of their own. The project is the brainchild of one Cody Wilson, a law student from Texas who defended it in the abstract under the constitution’s right to bear arms – “People say you’re going to allow people to hurt people, well, that’s one of the sad realities of liberty. People abuse freedom, but that’s no excuse not to have these rights or to feel good about someone taking them away from you,” he said in response to criticism – but also admitted that there may be valid legal concerns about the project moving forward. “I haven’t felt any real heat yet, but I think it’s very possible the project might happen outside of America or the files might be hosted outside of America,” he’s said when asked about potential legal threats. “The point of manufacture might also have to be outside of the United States.”

Apparently, that point of design may need to be outside of the United States as well, following new developments.

Stratsys, the company that created the uPrint SE 3D printer being used by Defense Distributed in the creation of the prototype, has released a statement about its seizure of the equipment, saying that it acted after discovering that Defense Distributed didn’t have a firearm manufacturer license. “It is the policy of Stratasys not to knowingly allow its printers to be used for illegal purposes,” the company explained in a letter to Wilson himself. That’s a charge that Wilson denies, saying “Our intentions are not to break the law. This is America; I don’t need to register a thing.”

If that sounds a little over-the-top and defiant to you, Wilson can apparently back it up. He told the Guardian newspaper that he approached the US Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives about Wiki Weapon, and was told that there were no clear guidelines on whether or not a license was necessary. “Basically, the law has not anticipated this,” Wilson explained. “Current laws rely on conventional ideas of what a gun is.”

Wilson isn’t deterred by this latest setback, having applied for a manufacturer’s license, and started work on turning Defense Distributed into a company in the traditional sense. “We’ll get there,” he said of the project’s ultimate aim, “but I guess I’ve got to turn into a capitalist before it’s all said and done.”

Read more: http://www.digitaltrends.com/cool-tech/3d-printed-gun-company-gets-machinery-repossessed-by-manufacturer/#ixzz2DOjFBxQx
Follow us: @digitaltrends on Twitter | digitaltrendsftw on Facebook

MORE – 

Just because 3D printing will make production more attainable by individuals, does that mean that everyone should be able to produce whatever they want? That hypothetical conundrum has a new reality to it with the announcement that Wiki Weapon, which aims to release plans to allow anyone to 3D print working firearms, has been fully funded.

The advent of 3D printing has been heralded by many as a revolution in mass production, especially with home versions of 3D printers now becoming available. With these devices and a little bit of technical know-how, the converts casually pronounce, anything is possible in the brave new world. That may be true, but it’s always worth remembering: “anything” doesn’t necessarily tend to limit itself to the good stuff.

Last week, Defense Distributed’s Wiki Weapon project reached its funding goal, meaning that – barring any unforeseen circumstances – it will be able to go ahead with its plan to create the world’s first fully-printable, working plastic gun, before going on to make the blueprints for said device available online, for free, for anyone to download and use to build their own firearm. As you might expect, that’s not an idea that thrills everyone.

The project is the creation of a University of Texas law student called Cody Wilson, who worked with a group of engineers, designers and programmers to develop the prototype device after discussing the idea with friends. Wilson is well-aware of ideological objections to make it possible for firearms to be created without license or guidelines, but he is firmly of the mindset that it’s better to live free than restrict an American’s right to bear arms. “People say you’re going to allow people to hurt people, well, that’s one of the sad realities of liberty. People abuse freedom,” he told the Guardian newspaper. “But that’s no excuse not to have these rights or to feel good about someone taking them away from you.”

Wilson is familiar with defending his idea. He initially tried to crowdsource Wiki Weapon on IndieGoGo, only for the website to freeze the project and refuse to share the $2,000 Wilson had already managed to raise beforehand (According to IndieGoGo, the project was frozen for violating company policy as it involved the sale of firearms, a charge that Wilson rejects as Wiki Weapon was never a for-profit project, nor planned to actually sell firearms, as such). Even after he went solo and managed to reach his crowdfunding goal, the problems haven’t ended; it turns out that actually fulfilling its aim may be illegal under US law (Specifically, it may run afoul of a 1988 law known as the Undetectable Firearms Act that prohibits entirely-plastic firearms).

Again, Wilson – who is, after all, a law student and therefore familiar with such legal challenges, is undeterred. “I haven’t felt any real heat yet, but I think it’s very possible the project might happen outside of America or the files might be hosted outside of America,” he’s on record as admitting. “The point of manufacture might also have to be outside of the United States.”

Even with full funding, it’s possible that Wiki Weapons will disappear without a trace like other crowdfunded projects. But it’s worth considering the project just a taste of what’s to come as 3D printing technology becomes more popular amongst the mainstream.

Read more: http://www.digitaltrends.com/cool-tech/wiki-weapon/#ixzz2DOizLm6t
Follow us: @digitaltrends on Twitter | digitaltrendsftw on Facebook

 

Leave a comment

Filed under Humor and Observations, Uncategorized

Personal Manufacturing Through 3D Printing

There is a revolution coming in the way we live that has already started.  You are of course familiar with taking a file and printing it on your printer.  It makes a two dimensional image, first in black and white, now in amazing color.  But imagine using a printer that prints in THREE dimensions.  Instead of ink, it uses steel, plastic, fibers, rubber, or other materials.  You design and object on a computer file, then “print it” using these materials.  You need shoes, put in the rubber, plastic, etc., download your own shoe design and size to the printer, print them out and put them on your feet.

Sound crazy?  It is here right now.  As prices come down, expect the next generation of our children to grow up, buy a design online, customize it, and print manufacture their own items at home.  It is the closest thing to a Star Trek style replicator we have come up with so far.  Here is a video that explains the process:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CP1oBwccARY&list=UUgKadKkzK-Ea_YnogNKtOlA&index=5&feature=plcp

Three dimensional printing will bring personal manufacturing to the world.  Amazing.

Leave a comment

Filed under Humor and Observations