Tag Archives: cloning

Could humans be cloned?

Could humans be cloned?

By Rachael Rettner

Published May 19, 2013

LiveScience

  • Battlestar Galactica cylons.jpg

    Actresses Tricia Helfer (left) and Grace Park (right), who played humanoid Cylons with countless clones on the TV show “Battlestar Galactica.” (Syfy)

  • Egg nucleus transfer final.jpg

    The first step during SCNT is enucleation or removal of nuclear genetic material (chromosomal) from a human egg. An egg is positioned with holding pipette (on the left) and egg’s chromosomes are visualized under polarized microscope. A hole is made in the egg’s shell (zone pellucida) using a laser and a smaller pipette (on the right) is inserted through the opening. The chromosomes then sucked in inside the pipette and slowly removed from the egg. (Cell, Tachibana et al.)

The news that researchers have used cloning to make human embryos for the purpose of producing stem cells may have some people wondering if it would ever be possible to clone a person.
Although it would be unethical, experts say it is likely biologically possible to clone a human being. But even putting ethics aside, the sheer amount of resources needed to do it is a significant barrier.

Since the 1950s when researchers cloned a frog, scientists have cloned dozens of animal species, including mice, cats, sheep, pigs and cows.

‘It’s grossly unethical.’

– Dr. Robert Lanza, chief scientific officer at the biotech company Advanced Cell Technology 

In each case, researchers encountered problems that needed to be overcome with trial and error, said Dr. Robert Lanza, chief scientific officer at the biotech company Advanced Cell Technology, which works on cell therapies for human diseases, and has cloned animals.

With mice, researchers were able to use thousands of eggs, and conduct many experiments, to work out these problems, Lanza said. “Its a numbers game,” he said.

But with primates, eggs are a very precious resource, and it is not easy to acquire them to conduct experiments, Lanza said.

In addition, researchers can’t simply apply what they’ve learned from cloning mice or cows to cloning people.

For instance, cloning an animal requires that researchers first remove the nucleus of an egg cell. When researchers do this, they also remove proteins that are essential to help cells divide, Lanza said. In mice, this isn’t a problem, because the embryo that is ultimately created is able to make these proteins again. But primates aren’t able to do this, and researchers think it may be one reason that attempts to clone monkeys have failed, Lanza said. [See How Stem Cell Cloning Works (Infographic)]

What’s more, cloned animals often have different kinds of genetic abnormalities that can prevent embryo implantation in a uterus, or cause the fetus to spontaneously abort, or the animal to die shortly after birth, Lanza said.

These abnormities are common because cloned embryos have just one parent rather than two, which means that a molecular process known as “imprinting” does not occur properly in cloned embryos, Lanza said. Imprinting takes place during embryo development, and selectively silences certain genes from one parent or the other.

Problems with imprinting can result in extremely large placentas, which ultimately leads to problems with blood flow for the fetus, Lanza said. In one experiment, Lanza and colleagues cloned a species of cattle called banteng, and it was born at twice the size of a normal banteng. It had to be euthanized, Lanza said.

The extremely high rate of death, and the risk of developmental abnormities from cloning makes cloning people unethical, Lanza said.

“It’s like sending your baby up in a rocket knowing there’s a 50-50 chance it’s going to blow up. It’s grossly unethical,” Lanza said.

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/science/2013/05/19/could-humans-be-cloned/#ixzz2TnzBJH7Y

Leave a comment

Filed under Humor and Observations

Man, Cyborg, Robot, Soon it Will be Hard to Tell

I now have around 15 pounds of titanium, plastic and high grade ceramic instead of a left hip and femur.  Many of us have artificial parts added to or inside our bodies now.  Fake bones, fake joints, artificial limbs, the new eye contact lenses I posted earlier, and so on.  Yet no one has looked at me and said I am no longer human.  But what if all my original parts were replaced?

Now they can tie human thought processes to control machines, such as artificial parts, and even have those parts send back signals like your real arm would.  We have decoded DNA and are starting to work with DNA splicing and improvement.  There are currently successful projects making progress on mapping brain impulses and memory centers.

My personal prediction is that in forty years, the distinction of what is human will be seriously blurred.  Maybe they can’t fix your severed spinal cord that makes you quadraplegic, so they drop your head onto a whole new mechanical body.  Suppose you get Alzheimers, so they take an earlier neural mapping of your brain and stick it into a neural net computer and replace your brain.  You think the same and have the same memories, but are you YOU?  Eventually, it will lead to every human part being replaced as it wears out.  After a hundred years or so, you will be all machine.  You will still think you are human, but are you?  Does your implanted memories and thought process into a completely artificial body retain its humanity?  If you are a believer, do you still have a soul?  Did your soul leave when your mind was replaced?

As robotics and electronic devices started to accelerate in their ability to replace and improve our natural parts, I believe cloning will not be as prevalent.  At some point, why even have skin?  It is difficult to maintain and prone to damage.  Sex?  Why not run a neural net program that simulates it instead of going out to a bar to find a partner?  We are only one or two generations away from artificial bodies being as accepted as smart phones and computer pads are now.  Yet how many have pondered the ramifications of this new world?

Here is an interesting article on the topic:

Half Man, Half Machine: Becoming Robotic

By Daniel Maas

show/hide words to know

 

How close are we to really having robot arms?

How close are we to really having robot arms?

What’s in the Story? 

Darth Vader, Luke Skywalker, Dr. Octopus, or Master Chief, what do they all have in common? Besides being famous villains and heroes, they are all part robot, or cyborgs.

Have you wondered if it were possible to become part robot like any of these characters? Thanks to science, it is no longer impossible. The PLoS Biology journal article “Learning to Control A Brain-Machine Interface for Reaching and Grasping by Primates,” discusses how our brains can control robotic parts.

Becoming a Machine

RobotA great example of this comes from the movie Spider-Man 2. Dr. Octopus is a scientist who invents four mechanical, octopus-like arms. He attaches them to his back so he can control them from his spinal cord. Then “Doc Oc” controls his robot arms with his own thoughts! Of course, things go wrong and the machine arms start to control him, making him a villian that Spider-man must stop.

Modern day science has not advanced enough to the point where you can have giant robot arms attached to your back, but we do know it’s not completely impossible. Some researchers are finding which parts of the central nervous system work best to control robot arms. When they find a good area, they attach a Brain-Machine Interface to connect the robotic parts to the nervous system. Scientists are already finding out what part of the brain works best to control robot parts.

Getting in Your Head

In the Dr. Octopus example, he thought that the best place for a brain-machine interface was in his spinal column because there are lots of neurons in your spinal cord. Neurons are the cells that receive and send signals from your brain to your muscles. But researchers in this study were more interested in how brain-machine interfaces connect to the brain, which also has lots of neurons. The scientists knew certain spots in the front and sides of the brain work better than others for this kind of task.

 

This is an illustrated representation of the experiment. The monkey almost looks like he’s playing video games here. But at the end of the experiment, the monkey believes the robotic arm is in control.

This is an illustrated representation of the experiment. The monkey almost looks like he’s playing video games here. But at the end of the experiment, the monkey believes the robotic arm is in control. Click to see larger version.

In the experiment, monkeys were trained to use a control stick and move it with their arms. Kind of like using an old video game controller. The monkeys used these control sticks to move one ball on a screen to a specific place on the other side of the screen. Once the monkeys got the hang of it, the control stick was removed and they watched the ball being move on its own. The trick was that the monkeys still thought they were controlling the motion. Finally, a robot arm was placed near the monkeys to make the same moves. Scientists took all of these steps so that the monkeys thought they were in control of the robotic arm moving the ball. 

During all of these steps, the scientists watched the brain wave patterns from the monkeys to see how different parts of the brain acted. The researchers monitored four specific areas of the brain to record how the monkeys though when they were moving the control sitck versus “moving” the robotic arm. This information was then used to recommend the best places to put a brain-machine interface.

What Did They Find?

After using many graphs and doing a lot of math, the team found that the front and sides of the brain contain lots of neurons that send signals to make your muscles move. Scientists suggested that any place in the brain was suitable to attach a brain-machine interfae, as long as it was attached to plenty of neurons. They also found out that it takes time to learn how to use the brain-machine interface. Scientists saw that the monkeys slowly adjusted to the robot arm, but with practice they thought their brains were using it.

What does this mean for us? It means that maybe like Dr. Octopus, people can start to use robotic limbs better. Scientists think that by using the areas they found, a brain-machine interface can work better in humans. Not only that, but scientists have proven that if you use a brain-machine interface like a robotic arm often enough, it would become easy to use and even feels like it is an actual part of our bodies. Just look at this guy playing checkers with his robotic arm!

 

Robotic arm

Sgt. Sebastian Cila demonstrates his new robotic hand on the Sesame Street special “Coming Home: Military Families Cope with Change,” Image from Wikimedia – Richard Termine

 


Robot drawing from Wikimedia – Mikael Nordin
Hand with robot hand from Wikimdia – Richard Greenhill and Marie De Ryck
Robot hand and light bulb from Wikimedia – Richard Greenhill and Hugo Elias

Leave a comment

Filed under Humor and Observations, Uncategorized