Tag Archives: Creator

Genetic ‘Adam’ and ‘Eve’ uncovered

I want to say that people often mistakenly think the Bible says that Adam and Eve were the first humans.  It does not.  In fact, when Cain, their son, kills another son, Abel, he is banished.  He is in fear that other people will kill him, so a mark of protection is placed on him.  He goes out to another land and marries.  Where did the other people come from?  To me, Adam and Eve were created and placed in a protected refuge – the Garden of Eden, protected from outside impacts.  Creating Adam and Eve and animal life could be considered today as genetic engineering or an experiment in a lab.  God created them, gave them free will and a few rules and saw what happened.  The entire Bible is pretty much like that.  From the chosen people of the Jews to the Christians of today, we are created by God but given free will, a set of standards to live by, and we get to choose.

You can explain things that they just happened, that ancient aliens experimented with us, or that a Creator made us.  My son told me that he could create certain basic amino acid reactions in the laboratory where he is studying to become a bio-chemical engineer.  Of course, it sometimes takes him many tries to get an experiment correct, even in laboratory conditions.  I personally don’t believe that every major “it just happened” event could occur at precisely the right time and place so many times to create what we are now.  I think just like my son doing a lab project, God created us in His lab of sorts.

So it is that information like the following fits in with my belief in God and my own personal theories of life on this planet and that it was created.  It is ok if you disagree.  That is your exercise of your own free will.  🙂

Genetic ‘Adam’ and ‘Eve’ uncovered

By Tia Ghose

Published August 02, 2013

LiveScience
  • X and Y chromosomes.jpg

    Human sex-determining chromosomes: X chromosome (left) and the much smaller Y chromosome. (University of Arizona)

Almost every man alive can trace his origins to one man who lived about 135,000 years ago, new research suggests. And that ancient man likely shared the planet with the mother of all women.

The findings, detailed Thursday, Aug. 1, in the journal Science, come from the most complete analysis of the male sex chromosome, or the Y chromosome, to date. The results overturn earlier research, which suggested that men’s most recent common ancestor lived just 50,000 to 60,000 years ago.

Despite their overlap in time, ancient “Adam” and ancient “Eve” probably didn’t even live near each other, let alone mate. [The 10 Biggest Mysteries of the First Humans]

“Those two people didn’t know each other,” said Melissa Wilson Sayres, a geneticist at the University of California, Berkeley, who was not involved in the study.

Tracing history
Researchers believe that modern humans left Africa between 60,000 and 200,000 years ago, and that the mother of all women likely emerged from East Africa. But beyond that, the details get fuzzy.

The Y chromosome is passed down identically from father to son, so mutations, or point changes, in the male sex chromosome can trace the male line back to the father of all humans. By contrast, DNA from the mitochondria, the energy powerhouse of the cell, is carried inside the egg, so only women pass it on to their children. The DNA hidden inside mitochondria, therefore, can reveal the maternal lineage to an ancient Eve.

But over time, the male chromosome gets bloated with duplicated, jumbled-up stretches of DNA, said study co-author Carlos Bustamante, a geneticist at Stanford University in California. As a result, piecing together fragments of DNA from gene sequencing was like trying to assemble a puzzle without the image on the box top, making thorough analysis difficult.

Y chromosome
Bustamante and his colleagues assembled a much bigger piece of the puzzle by sequencing the entire genome of the Y chromosome for 69 men from seven global populations, from African San Bushmen to the Yakut of Siberia.

By assuming a mutation rate anchored to archaeological events (such as the migration of people across the Bering Strait), the team concluded that all males in their global sample shared a single male ancestor in Africa roughly 125,000 to 156,000 years ago.

In addition, mitochondrial DNA from the men, as well as similar samples from 24 women, revealed that all women on the planet trace back to a mitochondrial Eve, who lived in Africa between 99,000 and 148,000 years ago almost the same time period during which the Y-chromosome Adam lived.

More ancient Adam
But the results, though fascinating, are just part of the story, said Michael Hammer, an evolutionary geneticist at the University of Arizona who was not involved in the study.

A separate study in the same issue of the journal Science found that men shared a common ancestor between 180,000 and 200,000 years ago.

And in a study detailed in March in the American Journal of Human Genetics, Hammer’s group showed that several men in Africa have unique, divergent Y chromosomes that trace back to an even more ancient man who lived between 237,000 and 581,000 years ago. [Unraveling the Human Genome: 6 Molecular Milestones]

“It doesn’t even fit on the family tree that the Bustamante lab has constructed. It’s older,” Hammer told LiveScience.

Gene studies always rely on a sample of DNA and, therefore, provide an incomplete picture of human history. For instance, Hammer’s group sampled a different group of men than Bustamante’s lab did, leading to different estimates of how old common ancestors really are.

Adam and Eve?
These primeval people aren’t parallel to the biblical Adam and Eve. They weren’t the first modern humans on the planet, but instead just the two out of thousands of people alive at the time with unbroken male or female lineages that continue on today.

The rest of the human genome contains tiny snippets of DNA from many other ancestors they just don’t show up in mitochondrial or Y-chromosome DNA, Hammer said. (For instance, if an ancient woman had only sons, then her mitochondrial DNA would disappear, even though the son would pass on a quarter of her DNA via the rest of his genome.)

As a follow-up, Bustamante’s lab is sequencing Y chromosomes from nearly 2,000 other men. Those data could help pinpoint precisely where in Africa these ancient humans lived.

It’s very exciting,” Wilson Sayres told LiveScience. “As we get more populations across the world, we can start to understand exactly where we came from physically.”

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/science/2013/08/02/genetic-adam-and-eve-uncovered/?intcmp=features#ixzz2bJRcOvJB

1 Comment

Filed under Humor and Observations, Uncategorized

Where Did The Universe Come From?

This is from a regular science column I write in order to break down complex scientific theories down to a level where the average sci-fi fan without extensive scientific training can understand them.  Please forgive where I over simplify.

Where Did The Universe Come From?

by Michael Bradley

Mankind is the only known species that spends time dwelling on how we happen to be here and do we have a purpose.  Beliefs both in science and in religion permeate every human society even in prehistoric times.  This primer will only deal with the astrophysics theorems as they have altered over modern times.

The atomic age brought in a theory that everything in the universe is composed of atoms.  These were classified on the handy Chart of Elements, protons and neutrons counted, electrons counted, rings of electrons and atomic mass all classified.  Unfortunately, this atomic theory fell apart as proof of dark matter appeared.  (This is discussed in an earlier article.)  Scientists, using Doppler theory, radio transmission and the red-blue shift now vary in believing atoms represent only 2% to 17% of the universe.  It is like standing in a dark field where 1,000 people have flashlights across from you, but maybe only two turn them on.  So we thought there were only two.

The rejection of atomic theory led to a radical theory called string theory.  That our universe basically is like a violin string that vibrates in ten dimensions.  This would explain many things, but it could not explain the beginning of things, the quantum singularity which many refer to as the big bang.  Also, string theory broke into five different theories instead of one.  Another group of theorists, the heavy gravity crowd believed that there were in fact 11 dimensions, not ten.

These two groups merged after fighting for years, and developed string theory using 11 dimensions, and suddenly the mathematics began to work and the five collapsed to one.  However, there were still problems.  The weakness of gravity is one problem.  Gravity might seem strong as it keeps things in orbit and keeps us from flying off Earth, and yet a weak child can pick an apple off the ground and toss it into the air.  Electromagnetism on the other hand can hold that same weight of ferrous material quite tightly.

Theorist began to wonder why gravity was weak.  Is it leaking out of our known universe?  Then someone came up with M theory, that instead of strings vibrating in 11 dimensions, that there is a membrane like object quivering in 11 dimensions.  If there were also other membranes, or P-branes, they could all co-exist and each have radically different laws of physics.  Perhaps gravity does NOT leak from our universe, but leaks INTO our universe from another P-brane consisting of nothing but gravitation?

The more the M theory explored these alternative universes, the more it made sense.  Basically, we are all intertwined membranes with unique series of attributes.  So what of the big bang?  Theorists now believe the membranes come in all sorts of sizes, flat, donut-shaped, and more.  As they move around and they shimmy and wiggle, they can run into each other.  A collision of membranes would not only explain the beginning of our universe, but also why clumps of it move differently, and why there are so many varieties of galaxies.  They were each made separately as individual wrinkles in wiggly P-branes collided multiple times.

It is the first modern theorem that can go beyond the quantum singularity of the big bang and explore what happened before.  If you picture a room filled with bubbles, floating around and sometimes touching, sometimes popping, sometimes combining or bouncing off each other, then that is one way of visualizing the infinite P-branes of which our M universe is one random bubble formed by collision and proximity with others and we each leak into and out of the others, forming our own unique laws of physics.

Religion or Science?  Astrophysics does not disprove or prove a greater power.  The more we explore the complexities and find just how beautiful and complicated existence is, the more each side has ammunition.  Believers will say that if you found a Swiss watch in the Sahara desert, keeping perfect time, would you think it evolved there, or that someone designed it and made it?  The more complex the design, the more it implies a designer.  However, most believers also acknowledge that this Creator will not give us proof, that we have to take a leap of faith.

Non-believers in the world of physics are looking for a single mathematical formula that will explain EVERYTHING.  M theory combined with P-branes and alternative universes co-existing in dark matter, all bumping together and affecting each other is the latest theory.  They believe there is NO Creator, despite the inclination of humans throughout history to build shrines and worship a Creator.

In the end, if an answer is ever definitively theorized, tested and proven, it will still leave one question unanswered.  Did it all just happen?  Or, did some Creator set it in motion?

Leave a comment

Filed under Humor and Observations, Writing

Why I Believe

You are walking across the Sahara desert, wondering the dunes, far from civilization and you find this:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Would you think – 1)  Look at what randomly evolved in the desert of the Sahara; or 2)  This thing is pretty complicated, it must have been made by someone and it must have some purpose?

I would naturally think 2).  I would be right, because the fine manufacture, and the systematic precision of the gears, the time management to the second over years of time, all indicate it was made by someone for a purpose.

Let’s say you come across things like this:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Again, design implies a designer and a purpose.  Humans, the Earth, the Universe, DNA, so many other things are much more complicated than that Swiss Watch in the desert – but we believers are the outlandish ones for thinking it didn’t just happen?  That there is a Creator with a purpose?

There are many reasons I believe.  I accept that this theory, you have to choose to have faith or not.  I have extensive science training and background and many look at me in wonder and say how can you believe?  I look at them in wonder and say how can you not?  If there was no designer, why does everything follow such defined rules?

I take comfort that there is a reason for us.  Accidents usually cause messes, like car accidents.  Creators make things that work in perfect precision.

 

 

 

Leave a comment

Filed under Humor and Observations