Tag Archives: politics

Should Your Former or Current Political Views Cost You Your Job?

This is post is NOT about what you believe about issues or agree with others.  It IS about whether you want to live in a world where you can lose your job for mainstream political beliefs that are later unpopular.

images

Case in point – Last week, Brendan Eich resigned as CEO of Mozilla under pressure after his support of California’s ban on gay marriage surfaced. In 2008, he made a $1,000 contribution supporting Proposition 8.

There is no evidence of Brendan Eich discriminating or persecuting gays or lesbians.  When in 2008, he donated $1,000 to a California traditional marriage proposition, not only did 2/3 of Californians agree and pass the proposition, but at the time, Barack Obama publicly stated his own opposition to same sex marriage.  (For the record, I don’t think government should be involved in marriage at all, nor should anyone use the government to keep others from living the way they wish, because today it is them, tomorrow it will be you.)

bus11-300x160

The point is, it was a private donation to a mainstream position – wrong or right – held by our President at the time and 2/3 of Californians.  Under campaign disclosure laws, someone looked it up, started a boycott and protest, and now the CEO of Mozilla resigned and is gone.  What if he had supported the opposition to the proposition and was pro-gay marriage and forced to resign?  Would that also be ok?

What causes have you supported throughout your life?  What petitions have you signed, organizations you have joined, money you have donated to charities?  Would you want something from your past that was done due to your personal belief and mainstream at the time to cause you to lose your job and career?

imagesCA47J8PB

In my opinion, it is just as wrong for people to persecute gays and lesbians in the past as it is for those groups who are now succeeding to persecute those who opposed them.  Should we implement slavery for white people to make up for the past slavery of black people?  Do we want to live in a country where the victorious take revenge on those they formerly disagreed with on a political issue to the point of taking away their ability to make a living?

Am I wrong about this?  I have been wrong before.  Still, if I am wrong, where does it stop?  Is it winner take all where once you are on top you squash the enemy?  I think that is not the way to live.  Why not be graceful in our victories and give former foes time to become future friends?

2 Comments

Filed under Humor and Observations

Historians unravel mystery behind cryptic Lincoln note

Historians unravel mystery behind cryptic Lincoln note

Published March 09, 2014

Associated Press
  • lincolninternal131.jpg

    This photo provided by Papers of Abraham Lincoln project shows a note written by Abraham Lincoln. (AP)

SPRINGFIELD, Ill. –  The cryptic note penned by Abraham Lincoln identifies its recipient only as “my dear Sir” and has a small section carefully clipped out.

Who was he writing to and why was a key piece of information later removed so meticulously?

Historians believe they have unraveled the mystery and uncovered a bit of political intrigue in the process.

Researchers at the Papers of Abraham Lincoln project concluded Lincoln was writing to an ally to ask him to maintain a secret relationship with a political insider during the 1860 election campaign.

Lincoln asked his cohort to “keep up a correspondence” with the person, a phrase that gave researchers their best clue. They ran it through a searchable database of Lincoln’s papers and found several matches.

One was in a letter to Lincoln from fellow attorney and Republican Leonard Swett of Bloomington, Ill.

The two men, it turns out, were conspiring to keep tabs on a New York political figure. The mystery note was Lincoln’s response to Swett’s letter, the researchers surmised.

“If you can keep up a correspondence with him without much effort, it will be well enough,” Lincoln wrote to Swett. “I like to know his views occasionally.”

Swett’s earlier letter also had a clue about who the political insider was. It referred to “our friend TW of Albany,” who researchers concluded was Thurlow Weed, a Republican newspaper editor and political boss of New York state.

Lincoln was seeking Weed’s support in New York, even though Weed had been backing front-runner William H. Seward for the Republican presidential nomination. Lincoln got his way, ultimately winning Weed’s support. Seward later became his secretary of state.

But Lincoln couldn’t be seen as close to Weed during the campaign so he recruited Swett to be a secret go-between. That also explains why Swett clipped Tweed’s name from Lincoln’s note.

A New York City manuscript dealer recently contacted the Papers of Abraham Lincoln for help solving the riddle.

The group of researchers is trying to identify, transcribe and publish all documents written by or to Lincoln. Project Director Daniel Stowell said Saturday that solving the mystery behind the note points to the project’s value.

“To be able to identify the date, recipient and subject of such a brief letter is a remarkable achievement,” he said.

Leave a comment

Filed under Humor and Observations

Fascism

First, to be clear, I want to say that I am 100% AGAINST Fascism.  That is why I am so concerned that since WW2 Americans have forgotten what it really is and our leaders, commentators and media have in my opinion intentionally distorted it.  We cannot avoid it recurring if we do not understand it.  The last major fascist rising cost the lives of over 50 million people, so we should never forget how it started so we can avoid it in the future.  To repeat the cliche, those who do not remember the past are doomed to repeat it.

The word Fascism, and the epithat “fascist” have lost all meaning in American conversation.  As with my earlier rant against the media’s penchant for stirring up racial divide, the mainstream media always gets political left and right incorrect as well, interchanging left for all things good, and right for all things bad.  An example – as you go left politically you pass by liberalism, then socialism, then to communism and ultimately to anarchism.  Clearly, communism is to the LEFT.  However, when the media talked about the Soviet Union, they would talk about the RIGHT-wing hard-liners as the evil ones, such as the KGB, and the reformers as the LEFT Wing reformers.  In the Soviet Union, the hard liners were the FAR LEFT hard liners and the reformers were Socialists, so they were to the RIGHT of the hard liners.

So it is with fascism, which your Professors and the Media would have you believe are extreme RIGHT wing, when in almost all cases they sprung up on the LEFT, through communists and labor movements.  There are exceptions of course.  In Spain and Argentina, the fascists were right wing.  In the Spanish Civil War, an early proxy fight leading up to WW2 the Franco faction was comprised of landowners, Hidalgos and Catholics.  The opposition were communists and anarchists.  The Soviets, French and Americans helped the left wingers while Italy and Germany helped Franco.

As with other wars, the movies and books are deceiving.  They talk about the horrors of the right wing (which did in fact happen) but glorify the left.  The communists and anarchists lost because they raped nuns, slaughtered priests, tried to take away all property rights and redistribute all land to new people, wanted to disband the military and replace it with mobs and even committed atrocities against each other.  Franco’s faction was supported by the Church, all property owners, and the military.  The Spanish Civil War was exceptionally bloody, and yes, Franco was RIGHT wing.  However, when Hemingway wrote For Whom The Bell Tolls, it was about glorifying fighting with the communists in the Spanish Civil War, but Hollywood changed it to WW1 instead, so you would be more sympathethic.

However, both Hitler and Mussolini were LEFT wing.  Hitler started out as a Communist Party operative, but could not get enough control.  Many of his fellows, such as Goebells started the same.  So they moved to the Socialist Party (still LEFT wing).  NAZI is short for National Socialist German Workers’ Party, a clearly LEFT wing, socialist workers’ movement that was anti-democracy and anti-capitalist.  Hitler used his brown shirt thugs to fight against the communist thugs in the streets.  The industrialists backed Hitler because they were more afraid of the communists, and they thought they could control him.  After he rose to power, Hitler threw his brown shirts under the bus to please the military, assassinating all their top leadership.  Hitler was a vegetarian, implemented anti-smoking laws and national fitness.  He built the first modern highways.

Mussonlini also was LEFT wing, starting in a socialist labor party.  Mussolini had his black shirt thugs to fight against the opposition.  Mussolini reclaimed and distributed land and got the trains running on time.  Hitler came into power due to an economic crisis brought on by an ineffective democracy and reparations after WW1.  Mussonlini took over from a Monarchy and ineffective government during economic crisis.  Franco took power by preserving the current government against crisis created by an incoming Marxist government.  All different approaches, groups, causes, so to call Fascism right wing or left wing is simply incorrect.  It is something else entirely.

Mirriam Websters defines Fascism as – a political philosophy, movement, or regime (as that of the Fascisti) that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition.

In simple terms, and in my opinion, fascism seeks to take over when a nation is divided politically and weakened economically.  It takes over more and more decision making and control in the name of rebirth and it uses the media and other sources to demonize and destroy those who disagree.  It attacks and weakens institutions that oppose its new rule.

Unfortunately, it is hard to tell you are becoming fascist as a nation, until after it happens.  All political movements and parties try to change goverment to their own designs and try to demonize and diminish opposition.

A clear example to me is Chavez in Venezuela.  He has police shut down and arrest media stations that do not agree with him, he rises as a labor, left wing man of the people.  He takes over the major industries, including the oil companies, which he gives to his brother to run.  He rewards his friends and oppresses, arrests or kills his enemies.  He unites his people by tough talk to America and his neighbors in Columbia while building up his military.

I don’t know if we are heading that way in America.  First, we started under the second Bush with bailing out Wall Street.  Since then, the federal government, for the good of “our nation” has taken over Wall Street while hiring people from Goldman Sachs to run the government, taken over health care, taken over the car manufacturers except Ford, taken over the Banking industry, taken over mortgages, taken over credit card companies, etc.  The federal government has tripled in size while our economy has been in deep recession.  Now they want to take over oil after pushing alternative fuels.  Everything is done “for our benefit” and yet more and more the government controls everything.

The press is more and more controlled by the government as well, with dissenting views threatened with censorship through “the fairness doctrine”, advertisers attacked, dissenting views are called hate speech, etc.  Like I said, it is hard to know if you are headed to fascism until afterwards.  No one realized it in Spain, Italy, Germany or Venezuela until after it happened.  I am not even saying this a Democrat or Republican issue.  I think it is a Washington elite issue where Ivy League trained lawyers think they know better than the rest of us how we should live.

That is why it is important to remember history.  We need to fight to keep out multiple party system, our free speech, our freedom of religion, our freedom of the press – and most important, our individual freedoms.  I yearn for the simpler days when I could buy whatever light bulb I wanted, I could get a toilet that flushed right, I could get a shower head that didn’t drizzle, I could do what I wanted even it was bad for me, like eat popcorn made with coconut oil.

Mostly I miss being able to express my political views without being attacked.

5 Comments

Filed under Humor and Observations

Pride versus Humility

Pride goes before destruction, and a haughty spirit before a fall. – The Bible, Proverbs 16:18 KJV.

Better it is to be of an humble spirit with the lowly, than to divide the spoil with the proud.  – The Bible, Proverbs 16:19

I have often seen in my own life that when I get all cocky and arrogant and full of myself, God is always there to remind me that is not the case.  I have grown proud on many occasions, only to be humbled rather harshly.  Now some might attribute this to kharma, back luck, or some other source than God.  In fact, many might not agree that God acts in such a way, but I do.  The reason is, I am always a much better person and much happier when I am humble.  I have seen this in my own family, my friends, and my offspring.  When we are haughty, we will soon be humbled.  When we are humble, we live better.

This has become such a fact to me that many of my relatives and friends are probably bored and annoyed with me saying it.  Every time I fear that I, or someone close to me, is getting too arrogant, I say, Pride goeth before the Fall.  I know it’s not a proper translation, but I like the way it rolls of the tongue.  I always mean it as a friendly caution, whether to me, or to others.  Believe me, it is all too common a problem for me personally, so I remind myself the most.

I have seen many politicians that get full of themselves, only to go down in flames in scandal.  The same for famous sports or movie folks.  Congressman Wiener, Lindsay Lohan, Brett Fahvre, Donald Trump – hey we could make a list as long as the census couldn’t we?

I have some friends that are much nicer than I am.  In fact, nearly everyone is nicer than I am.  I grew up abused and I grew a thick, cynical crusty shell.  My friend Frank Chow,  my recent friend Cameron Milkins – they are people I aspire to be like.  They face life with humility and it makes them wonderful people. 

Pride in your children, in a job well done, in a successful project are all good things.  But thinking too highly of yourself, not realizing how lucky you are to live today in a relatively free society, to not worry about food and shelter, your talents you were born with – those things are not from you, they are from God.  In Henry V, my favorite Shakespeare play, King Henry, after winning the battle of Agincourt (the most lopsided victory since the 300 Spartans), decrees that any man who claims credit and does not give all credit to God, would be slain.  His army of some 5,000 diseased troops faced around 40,000 heavily armed and fresh Frenchman.  He lost less than 100, they lost over 10,000 and surrendered.  In those highest moments in our lives is when we must remain the most humble and thankful.

I have so many blessings in my life, my wife, my children, my friends.  I have been given talents and limitations in my life for which I am thankful.  I am not usually ‘preachy’ like this but watching the politicians in all parties during this election cycle has made me sick of the whole thing.  In America especially, the media likes to build up a hero then crush them.  Charlie Sheen is one example.  Ashton Kutchner was a hero for marrying an older woman.  Now he is a bastard for leaving her.  When I was growing up, my history books told me our founding fathers were brave, meaningful people who risked their lives to build a free country.  Now history books say they were arrogant rich white men oppressing the Native Americans and allowing slavery.

It is a cautionary note which leads me to write this.  For myself, for everyone, our lives are brief.  We are given our talents and our limits.  It is how we live that is truly ours.  Are we honest, forgiving, kind, loving of our neighbors?  Or are we self-centered, greedy and only looking out for ourselves?  Every day I say to myself –

Pride goes before the fall…

4 Comments

Filed under Humor and Observations